JoelNothman.com

9 November, 2008

Giving birth and being reborn

Filed under: Computational linguistics,Wikipedia by Joel @ 4:45 pm, 9 November 2008.

After 6 years as an undergraduate student, I have finally handed in my honours thesis:

Words 24,000+
Pieces of paper 62
Thesis pages 82
Front matter pages 9
Back matter pages 24
Chapters 8
Sections 33
Appendices 3
References 116
Footnotes 56
Tables 47 (or 67)
Figures 16 (or 22)
Project time in months 8
Days since starting to write 110

I pity my markers.

And here it is, in case anyone cares: Learning Named Entity Recognition from Wikipedia.

And now, I am reborn. What to do with myself? So much to do with myself. But at least I have time to work it out… =)

22 June, 2008

Wikipedia categories ≠ ontology

Filed under: Wikipedia by Joel @ 2:07 pm, 22 June 2008.

I think I’m probably stating the obvious here. If we take a single trace of an article such as Tom Cruise through the category hierarchy in Wikipedia, we find out that he is merely a theory…

Tom Cruise1962 births1960s births20th century birthsBirths by yearPeopleHumansApesPrimatesMammalsVertebratesChordatesAnimalsEukaryotesOrganismsLifeCore issues in ethicsEthicsBranches of philosophyPhilosophyBeliefSpiritualityHuman behaviourBehaviourBranches of psychologyPsychologyInterdisciplinary fieldsAcademic disciplinesAcademiaEducationPersonal developmentPersonal lifeSelfMetaphysicsRealityPhilosophical conceptsPhilosophical terminologyTerminologyVocabularyLanguageCommunicationSocial psychologySocial philosophyPhilosophical movementsMovementsIdeologiesEpistemologyPhilosophy of scienceAnalytic philosophy20th century philosophy20th century2nd milleniumMilleniaYearsChronologyMeasurementScientific observationData collectionData managementComputer dataComputer storageComputer memoryDigital mediaDigital technologyElectronicsElectromagnetismSpecial relativityRelativityTheoretical physicsTheories → …

And yes, this isn’t completely irrelevant. It relates to my honours research work. It means that the Wikipedia category hierarchy is only useful as a folksonomy, or perhaps only for a very small hierarchical depth beneath each article…

Powered by WordPress