http://www.joelnothman.com/2007/10/28/cousin-ishmael/ Hobbily blogging Mon, 02 Jan 2012 02:17:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.joelnothman.com/2007/10/28/cousin-ishmael/comment-page-1/#comment-4236 Jakayla Mon, 02 Jan 2012 02:17:57 +0000 http://www.joelnothman.com/2007/10/28/cousin-ishmael/#comment-4236 That hits the target peerflcty. Thanks! That hits the target peerflcty. Thanks!

]]> http://www.joelnothman.com/2007/10/28/cousin-ishmael/comment-page-1/#comment-2127 Simon Holloway Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:57:25 +0000 http://www.joelnothman.com/2007/10/28/cousin-ishmael/#comment-2127 No way: it's definitely better like this. I like to think of Ibn Ezra as commenting on Rashi here anyway. No way: it’s definitely better like this. I like to think of Ibn Ezra as commenting on Rashi here anyway.

]]> http://www.joelnothman.com/2007/10/28/cousin-ishmael/comment-page-1/#comment-2126 Joel Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:43:46 +0000 http://www.joelnothman.com/2007/10/28/cousin-ishmael/#comment-2126 Yeah, the ambiguity in the way I wrote it can be taken the wrong way. Should I have repeated the first line again before Ibn Ezra's take? Yeah, the ambiguity in the way I wrote it can be taken the wrong way. Should I have repeated the first line again before Ibn Ezra’s take?

]]> http://www.joelnothman.com/2007/10/28/cousin-ishmael/comment-page-1/#comment-2088 Simon Holloway Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:37:40 +0000 http://www.joelnothman.com/2007/10/28/cousin-ishmael/#comment-2088 They're not necessarily disagreeing. They just had different kids. They’re not necessarily disagreeing. They just had different kids.

]]>